Debunking the Myth of Assange as Terrorist

Ten years ago, President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. referred to Founder and former Editor-in-Chief of Wikileaks Julian Assange as a “high-tech terrorist.” Saying this, Biden located himself within one of the more potent, but entirely unsound anti-Assange narratives. This mythical line of thinking, originally motivated by notions that Assange was a facilitator of terrorism against the United States, remains prevalent to this day. It motivates either implicitly or explicitly so many governments’ libelous, defamatory, and violent pursuits of Assange.

In February 2010, Wikileaks began releasing a voluminous trove of classified documents too many members of the American establishment suspiciously over-emphasized contained the identities of informants overseas. In July of that year thru September 2011, and eventually as a result of a series of unfortunate and unforeseen events, not immediately related to any control Assange had over the execution of what ultimately became known as “Cablegate,” Wikileaks released the entirety of the trove.

Initially, all went according to plan. In an agreement with news publications El Pais, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, The Guardian, and The New York Times, Wikileaks released an assortment of classified documents, redacting the identities of all informants mentioned within the originals. However, in February 2011, David Leigh of The Guardian published within a book the passcode used to access the remaining documents, after he had mistaken that passcode as temporary.

To make matters worse a few months later in August, Der Freitag, a German weekly, published details pertinent to accessing the files, as well. As a result, and through no fault directly or entirely of Assange’s, over 250,000 diplomatic cables surged across the globe online in unredacted form for consumption by the worldwide public. Only after this did Wikileaks release all of the diplomatic cables in unredacted form. But it cannot be emphasized enough that Assange went to great lengths at this time to mitigate the possible fallout from revelations about the informants’ identities. At one point, Assange contacted the Department of State, insisting on speaking directly with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and saying, “unless we do something, people’s lives are put at risk.”

Hours passed before Assange received a call back. An attorney for the Department of State, and not Secretary Clinton, spoke with Assange during that phone call, saying that the State Department could not assist Wikileaks in attenuating the possibility of lethal fallout stemming from the leak. None of the newspapers involved at any stage of “Cabletgate” did as Assange did. The onus of precluding the possible fallout was left to Assange, who handled this situation in a way that was emblematic of humanitarian concern for the lives of those so many Obama administration officials later urgently claimed were put at imminent risk as a result solely of Assange. But I ask: what about the other newspapers? This question is often referred to as “The New York Times Problem,” which led the Obama administration to terminate its pursuit of Assange. Recognizing that criminalizing Assange would necessitate criminalizing all of the other publications that released the diplomatic cables before Wikileaks did, the Justice Department under Obama, led at that time by Attorney General Eric Holder, observed the need to refrain from seeking Assange’s extradition. Despite this obviously sound line of reasoning, the Trump administration so disgustingly has pursued Assange in recent history. While a total of 17 different organizations published the unredacted portions of the diplomatic cables, only Assange is now facing the possibility of 175 years in solitary confinement in the United States.

Recently, former presidential candidate Marianne Williamson contacted me to ask why Assange ever released the unredacted documents, saying that his doing so, “did not do much for his case.” While Williamson has asserted the need to dismiss the charges against Assange, she raises an interesting question–a question that draws attention to distorted opinions of Assange’s motivation in releasing the unredacted portions of the diplomatic cables. Indicating how noble Assange’s intentions were in releasing the unredacted portions of the documents, Pulitzer Prize-winning author Glenn Greenwald once wrote in an article for Salon.com, “Facts and myths in the Wikileaks/Guardian saga:”

“Once WikiLeaks realized what had happened, they notified the State Department, but faced a quandary: virtually every government’s intelligence agencies would have had access to these documents as a result of these events, but the rest of the world — including journalists, whistleblowers and activists identified in the documents — did not. At that point, WikiLeaks decided — quite reasonably — that the best and safest course was to release all the cables in full, so that not only the world’s intelligence agencies but everyone had them, so that steps could be taken to protect the sources and so that the information in them was equally available.”

In other words, Assange released the unredacted portions of the documents in order to protect the lives of those the American government claimed he jeopardized. He did not release the documents recklessly or with the intention of causing harm to anyone.

Despite how responsibly Assange handled the situation, as Greenwald argues in “Facts and myths in the Wikileaks/Guardian saga,” entities across the political spectrum in the United States claimed that Assange had “blood on his hands,” alleging he had put the informants mentioned within the diplomatic cables at risk of lethal retribution by international terrorist organizations and authoritarian governments seeking revenge on those that cooperated with the United States. Figures across the Obama administration from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen alleged Assange’s sanguinariness. But it wasn’t just within the Democratic establishment that the notion of Assange as a criminal interested in killing innocents became commonplace. 2008 vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin added to this anti-Assange rhetoric, asserting at one time that Assange was “an anti-American operative with blood on his hands.” Following that up by asking, “Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?” Palin lumped Assange in with terrorists easily understood as such by most of the American public. The comparison is entirely unfair, and it is interesting to note that Palin as of late has been a supporter of dismissing the charges against Assange.

Roughly ten years later, in and following the superseding indictment released against Assange long before the ruling on Monday, 4 January 2021 in the United Kingdom, the Department of Justice continues to forward this myth about the Australian anti-secrecy radical. Influenced by how the Obama administration prosecuted more whistleblowers than all other administrations combined, President Trump’s hatred of the news media community, and a variety of other factors, politicians across the political spectrum these days also demonize the radical as a facilitator of violence against the United States.

At the same time, news media outlets, in many respects regardless of their political orientation, distort assignment of culpability in regard to Assange and the complete and ultimate release by Wikileaks of the diplomatic cables; all too often it is forgotten that so many other well-respected and prestigious news publications did just as Wikileaks did. And then of course it has conveniently fallen out of focus that Assange ardently attempted to mitigate the possibility of fallout from “Cablegate,” while no other organizations involved in “Cablegate” did in the way that Assange did. And so the myth of Assange as a terrorist has gained egregious momentum, while it may not always be the case that the word “terrorist” is explicitly used in reference to him.

While the superseding indictment, comprised of 17 charges against Assange of violating The Espionage Act of 1917 and one charge of violating The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, does not specifically charge Assange with having committed an act of terror, the myth of Assange as such an actor is alive and well. It has been a myth used to brainwash the public into supporting Trump’s violent pursuit of a journalist—an assault on constitutionally guaranteed protections for the press, one of the most fundamental tenets of a democratic republic and a liberal democracy.

13 April 2017 Director of the CIA Michael Pompeo referred to Assange as a “darling” of jihadist groups and to Wikileaks as a “non-state hostile intelligence service.” Speaking as the newly appointed CIA Director that day, Pompeo was addressing a crowd at Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, DC., and his remarks seemed to be a response to the release of the first part of Vault 7, a series of documents disseminated by Wikileaks revealing problematic and legally suspect practices within the American intelligence community. And let us not forget that President Trump, who appointed Pompeo, repeatedly exclaimed during his first run for President in 2016, “I love Wikileaks.”

From 2017 thru the present, this myth has only gained more and more ground. 11 April 2019, the day Assange was arrested by British authorities and dragged from The Ecuadorian Embassy in London, Wired.com released “Breaking Down the Hacking Case Against Julian Assange,” in which journalist Andy Greenberg wrote:

“[New York City-based attorney Tor] Ekelund also points out that to expand the statute of limitations for the CFAA from the normal five years to the necessary eight in this case, given the indictment’s date of March 2018, the Justice Department is charging Assange under a statute that labels his alleged hacking an “act of terrorism.”

More recently on 12 September 2019, Kevin Gosztola of Shadowproof.com interviewed each of the presidential candidates about their attitudes towards Assange. While some flat out claimed they would drop the charges, such as Senator Bernie Sanders and the aforementioned Marianne Williamson, others such as President Biden, obliquely answered the question, while still indicating their disdain for Assange, again claiming that Assange had put lives at risk. Recall, however, that it was established earlier herein that Assange was not the sole and was indeed the last agent to disseminate the unredacted portions of the diplomatic cables. Undue emphasis on his culpability is problematic, as a result. On top of that, it is important to remember that no evidence of harm done to informants has ever been documented. In the article by Greenwald cited earlier, the former co-founder of The Intercept testifies to this, when he writes:

“Recall that Adm. Michael Mullen and others accused WikiLeaks of having “blood on its hands” as a result of publication of the Afghan War documents, but that turned out to be totally false; as Shane noted today in the NYT: ‘no consequence more serious than dismissal from a job has been reported.’ Even Defense Secretary Robert Gates mocked claims about the damage done by WikiLeaks as “significantly overwrought.”

But let’s make the following clear: the superseding indictment alleges violations of espionage and hacking laws, while it does not explicitly enumerate charges of terrorism. Nevertheless, against the backdrop of the portrait our government and media have painted of Assange and embedded within the charges of espionage and espionage-motivated hacking crimes, there is an implied charge. That charge, perhaps necessarily and inextricably related to the disruptive, dissident, and occasionally even violent essence of espionage, is that Assange is a dangerous criminal mastermind of global proportions in cahoots with terrorists and to varying degrees involved in the deaths of innocent people. The absence of charges in the superseding indictment explicitly organized around allegations of terrorism are also interesting insofar as it likely indicates that our government itself appreciates the illegitimacy of charging Assange with acts of terror; teams of lawyers at the Department of Justice, led by William Barr up until recently, likely understood that substantiating their arguments for Assange’s extradition with charges of terrorism was not going to yield their desired result. In other words, it seems the D.O.J. probably recognizes the myth of Assange as terrorist as absurd.

What must be emphasized again is that no evidence of deaths amongst the global community of informants has been documented in the wake of “Cablegate.” And members of the Obama administration were fully willing to speak publicly on this lack of evidence. For example, former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates at one time spoke to this issue, ultimately claiming that “Cablegate” was nothing more than an embarrassing nuisance. It is of equal importance that Assange has never exhibited the intention to cause violence against anyone, let alone the informants mentioned in the diplomatic cables. He is guided in part by the principled notion that freedom of information is a powerful way to foster peace. In fact, he once said, “If wars can be started by lies, peace can be started by truth.”

So, what is terrorism, and what is a terrorist? To dispel the ludicrous notion that Assange is such a criminal, it is necessary to define what such an actor is, and then disqualify Assange of the elements of that designation.

In an interview on the day British Judge Vanessa Baraitser blocked Assange’s extradition, 4 January 2021, I spoke with Egypt’s Rapporteur on the Rule of Law, Professor Mohamed A. ‘Arafa, SJD on legislative and judicial treatments of terrorists both within The United States and The United Kingdom. A professor of Law at Alexandria University in Egypt and an adjunct Professor of Law at Cornell Law School, Professor Arafa revealed that, to synopsize what he said during our interview by quoting an article he co-authored on terrorism, “The U.S. government alone employs 22 different definitions of terrorism,” all of which to varying degrees indicate terrorism as a behavior involving conduct geared towards the perpetration of illegal violence. (‘Arafa, Mohamed A, and Adam J Rovello. “Terrorism Under the Umbrella of International Criminal Law.” Crime-in-Crisis.com, 2017, crime-in-crisis.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/57-mohamed-KOURAKIS-FS_Final_Draft_26.4.17.pdf.) In other words, given the volume of definitions, the legal identification of terrorists within American judicial bodies tends to be convoluted. In addition, as Professor ‘Arafa has written, the legal definition of terrorism in the United Kingdom, found within the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1974 (PTA) Section 14(1) of the PTA 1974, is “the use of violence for political ends, and includes any use of violence for the purpose of putting the public or any section of the public in fear.” (Ibid.)

With the immediately aforementioned in mind, let us ask: during his tenure at Wikileaks, did Assange embody all of the above-enumerated elements of a legally recognized terrorist? And against the backdrop of this, does precedent in the British extradition system and in the United States criminal justice system afford one a legally sound basis for recognizing Assange as a terrorist in an application of the statutory definitions of terrorism. As precedent, the extradition trial of Abu Hamza al-Masri is indispensable and uncompromisingly relevant to further debunk the myth of Assange as terrorist, as well. Hamza’s conduct emblematized terrorism, both within the United States and the United Kingdom. The opinion that Hamza is a quintessential terrorist also characterizes many entities’ attitudes toward him across the globe. Professor Arafa suggested the validity of such a comparison during our interview, suggesting that it was an effective way to raze to the ground the myth of Assange as terrorist.

An Egyptian-born Imam extradited from the UK to the US on charges that he committed 11 acts of or relating to terror against the United States, Hamza preached Islamic Revivalism at Finsbury Park Mosque in London, England, where he was a naturalized citizen. The 11 charges for which the United Kingdom extradited him and of which the United States convicted him involved: (1) aiding terrorist plots in Yemen that resulted in the deaths of hostages; (2) working towards the establishment of a terrorist training camp in Bly, OR.; and, (3) facilitating violent jihad in Afghanistan.

Much attention was drawn in the first set of charges to how Hamza had provided the hostage-takers in Yemen with access to a satellite phone, telephonically providing advice to the hostage-takers in real time as to how to perpetrate the hostage-taking. Not too long thereafter in a recorded conversation, Hamza also claimed that hostage-taking was “a good thing” under Islam.

In regard to the second set of charges, the Islamic Revivalist was convicted of sending a member of his circle from the UK to the US to plan out and construct the terrorist training camp in the Pacific Northwest. And in regard to the third set of charges, Hamza was found guilty of remotely organizing jihadist training camps in Afghanistan, while also ultimately providing “goods and services” to the Taliban there, to quote the official statement released by our government following Hamza’s sentencing in the U.S.

Given that Hamza was extradited on convictions of acts of terror in 2012 from the United Kingdom (the same jurisdiction where Assange’s extradition was just blocked) to the United States (the same jurisdiction where Assange would have ended up had his extradition not been blocked) and given that it is commonly recognized that Hamza is the most high-profile non-state actor extradited from the UK to the US on charges of terrorism, shouldn’t we contrast Hamza’s crimes with Assange’s so-called and alleged ones?

While Assange was not charged with terrorism in the superseding indictment, it is still cultural, legal, and political folklore in America that Assange either really was and is a terrorist or at least functions in the same capacity as a terrorist. But to re-iterate, no evidence of harm to the informants, whose identities were revealed in the diplomatic cables first by many news publications and only then by Wikileaks, has been documented. And Assange was neither motivated by homicidal malice nor caused the deaths of innocents. It goes without saying that Hamza is the opposite.

Let’s recall that Assange was tried for extradition on charges that he committed 17 violations of The Espionage Act of 1917 and one violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Nevertheless, the publishing conduct in which he engaged with Wikileaks was never violent. In the context of Professor Arafa’s observations about the definitions of terrorism and against the backdrop of precedent set in the case of Hamza, Assange is definitely not a terrorist, while Hamza is. Yet, however, it is interesting that Hamza is now rotting in solitary confinement at the same supermax prison where Assange may still ultimately end up, ADX Florence in Florence, Colorado, so frequently called America’s worst prison.

While Assange has been identified as a terrorist either implicitly or explicitly over the last decade, it is both disturbing and interesting to observe that his behavior, identical to that of every other national security and government intelligence journalist and every editor of so many news publications across the globe, seems to be tantamount in our government’s eyes to terrorism.

Activist Ralph Nader once wrote, “Information is the currency of power.” In all of his activism around freedom of information, Assange has meant to empower vulnerable peoples that are subject to abusive regimes. By contrast, in trying to take down the quintessential journalist emblematizing the democratic power of information freedom, our government is again demonstrating it is only interested in suppressing our power and that of so many people across the globe. To characterize Assange as a terrorist, either implicitly or explicitly, brings with it a dangerous consequence, which is to make anathema and illegal the practice of journalism. It also seems that our government feels journalism is even a means by which someone can perpetrate crimes against humanity.

Fund the author’s work by PayPal.

Email the author at [email protected]

Twitter: @reframerorg

151 thoughts on “Debunking the Myth of Assange as Terrorist

  1. Not to long, and IMHO an Easy FACTUAL this one article can pretty much bring an Assange wikileaks NOOB right up to speed. Had to take pause to send a 🎩👊( hat tip) NICELY DONE is an understatement 🌐🌬️🍀

    1. Massive work. Took me 3 hours to digest it all. I am so grateful. Provides more sober info to include in letter each day to MPs, Bar Associations UK; & regional newspapers in England, Scotland, Wales, Nthn Ireland, Ireland . Thankyou

  2. Everyone should read thelis post if you care about injustice! Assange is honorable
    to free speech which is basic to a democratic culture!
    President Biden has the fate of Julian Assange in hos hands. Di the right thing Mr Biden and drop charges by US. Do not extradite Assange!

  3. I want to share a message that has been spreading all over the internet that concerns the times we are living in. Whether you believe in God or not, this is a must read message!

    We can see throughout time how we have been slowly conditioned to come to this point where we are on the verge of a cashless society. Would it surprise you to know that the Bible foretold of this event? Don’t believe me? This may be the most imporant message you will read in these times…please do not ignore this!

    This messsage reveals what the Mark of the Beast is, and the meaning behind counting a number people have been pondering for centuries, 666. This message also shares why Barack Obama will be the Antichrist. This is truly a message from God!

    In the Revelation of Jesus Christ given to the apostle John, we read:

    “He (the false prophet who deceives many by his miracles) causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666” (Revelation 13:16-18 NKJV).

    Referring to the last generation, this could only be speaking of a cashless money society, which we have yet to see, but are heading towards. Why? Revelation 13:17 tells us that we cannot buy or sell unless we receive the mark of the beast in our right-hand or forehead. We could still buy or sell among one another without receiving the mark if physical money was still currency. It logically deduces itself to this reason.

    These verses could not be referring to something spiritual because the word references two different physical locations (our right-hand or forehead) stating the mark will be on one “OR” the other. It once again logically deduces itself to this reason.

    Here is where it really starts to come together. It is shocking how accurate the Bible is concerning the RFID microchip. These are notes from a man named Carl Sanders who worked with a team of engineers to help develop this microchip in the late 1960’s.

    “Carl Sanders sat in seventeen New World Order meetings with heads-of-state officials such as Henry Kissinger and Bob Gates of the C.I.A. to discuss plans on how to bring about a one-world system. The government commissioned Carl Sanders to design a microchip for identifying and controlling the peoples of the world—a microchip that could be inserted under the skin with a hypodermic needle (a quick, convenient method that would be gradually accepted by society).

    Carl Sanders, with a team of engineers behind him, with U.S. grant monies supplied by tax dollars, took on this project and designed a microchip that is powered by a lithium battery, rechargeable through the temperature changes in our skin. Without the knowledge of the Bible (Brother Sanders was not a Christian at the time), these engineers spent one-and-a-half-million dollars doing research on the best and most convenient place to have the microchip inserted.

    Guess what? These researchers found that the forehead and the back of the hand (the two places Revelation says the mark will go) are not just the most convenient places, but are also the only viable places for rapid, consistent temperature changes in the skin to recharge the lithium battery. The microchip is approximately seven millimeters in length, .75 millimeters in diameter, about the size of a grain of rice. It is capable of storing pages upon pages of information about you. All your general history, work history, crime record, health history, and financial data can be stored on this chip.

    Brother Sanders believes that this microchip, which he regretfully helped design, is the “mark” spoken about in Revelation 13:16-18. The original Greek word for “mark” is “charagma,” which means a “scratch or etching.” It is also interesting to note that the number 666 is actually a word in the original Greek. The word is “chi xi stigma,” with the last part, “stigma,” also meaning “to stick or prick.” Carl believes this refers to a hypodermic needle (see photo).

    Mr. Sanders asked a Boston Medical Center doctor what would happen if the lithium contained within the RFID microchip leaked into the body. The doctor responded that if the microchip broke inside a human body, the lithium would cause a severe and painful wound filled with pus. This is what the book of Revelation says:

    “And the first (angel) went, and poured out his vial on the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore on the men which had the mark of the beast, and on them which worshipped his image” (Revelation 16:2).

    THE HIDDEN MEANING BEHIND THE NUMBER 666 REVEALED!

    What I first want to mention, before I share what the Holy Spirit has revealed to me concerning the number of the beast, is that God confirms in threes. We can see this throughout scripture:

    “For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one” (1 John 5:7 NKJV).

    “and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures” (1 Corinthians 15:4 NKJV).

    “…Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, Who was and is and is to come!” (Revelation 4:8 NKJV).

    There are many more examples, but I thought I would just share three of them to make the point.

    Examining Revelation 13:16,17,18, the first group of three I would like to point out is that the mark of the beast is described in three separate verses, 16, 17 and 18.

    The next three I see is in verse 16, “He causes all…” is followed by three contrasting categories of people,

    1 – “both small and great,
    2 – rich and poor,
    3 – free and slave…”.

    Then unto verse 17, it opens with, “and that no one may buy or sell except one who has…”, followed by three explanations of what one must have to buy or sell,

    1 – “…the mark
    2 – or the name of the beast,
    3 – or the number of his name”.

    Now unto verse 18, we read “Let him who has understanding calculate…”, which is followed by,

    1 – “the number of the beast,
    2 – for it is the number of a man:
    3 – His number is 666”.

    The last three I see is the number “6” being used three times in a row. The reason I’m making this point about God confirming in three is because it is the key to unlocking how to calculate the number 666.

    Throughout the centuries there have been people trying to calculate numbers based on titles and names that come up to the number 666 to identify one person, the Antichrist; but from Revelation 13:18, I do not see where God is telling us to count up to 666, but rather to count the number of the beast. This number is identified as 666. So the verse is telling us to count the number 666.

    What does it mean to count? It means to add up. So how could we add up 666? Remember my previous point about God confirming in threes is key to unlocking the number 666. So logically, what would be the best way to count the number 666? To count it equally by using the rule of three based off the number.

    We cannot count it equally as 600+60+6, this would also bring us back to the start.

    We cannot count it as 600+600+600, or 60+60+60 because there are no zeroes in between or at the end of 666.

    The only logical option is 6+6+6=18.

    What is interesting is that the verse that reveals for us to count the number itself is verse 18 (there a total of 18 verses in Revelation Chapter 13), being the third verse out of the three verses that describe the mark of the beast in Revelation 13:16,17,18. What is 18 divided by 3? 6. So 3×6=18, or 6+6+6=18.

    Another interesting point is the only two other combinations (making a total of three possible combinations) for placing a “+” symbol in between 666 are:

    66+6=72 and 6+66=72.

    Add both 72’s together and you get 144.

    Why the number 144 is worth our attention is because the verse following Revelation 13:18 is the first time in the Bible where the 144,000 are being described in detail:

    “Then I looked, and behold, a Lamb standing on Mount Zion, and with Him one hundred and forty-four thousand, having His Father’s name written on their foreheads…” (Revelation 14:1).

    Now if you add up all three numbers from counting 666 by moving the “+” symbol around, it would be 72+72+18=162. What is compelling about the number 162, is, if you divide 144,000 by 162, you get 888. The name of Jesus in Greek gematria adds up to 888. The New Testament was originally written in the Greek language. Revelation 14:1 not only mentions the 144,000, but also the Lamb who is Jesus.

    Now what is interesting about the number for Jesus, 888, is that if you apply the same formula that was used to count 666, you get 8+8+8=24. Why the number 24? Revelation chapter 4 tells us there are 24 elders seated around the throne of God. This is the same throne where Jesus sits.

    Now if you take:

    8+8+8=24

    8+88=96

    88+8=96

    you get 24+96+96=216.

    Take 144,000 divided by 216 and you get 666.

    Remember that this was the same exact formula we used to count the number 666 that ultimately brought forth the number 888.

    Here is a quick recap to demonstrate how this formula confirms itself as being the true way to count 666:

    1: 6+6+6=18 > 66+6=72 > 6+66=72 > 18+72+72=162

    2: 144,000 divided by 162=888

    3: 8+8+8=24 > 88+8=96 > 8+88=96 > 24+96+96=216

    4: 144,000 divided by 216=666

    1: 6+6+6=18 > 66+6=72…

    As you can see, it is perpetual. And remember that we consistently used a formula that worked in threes being the number that God uses for confirmation.

    So what could this mean? Well we know in this world we are identified by numbers in various forms. From our birth certificate to social security, as well as our drivers license; being identified based on a system of ruler ship. So it is possible that this RFID microchip will contain a new identification that has a total of 18 characters (6+6+6).

    “here the wisdom is, the one having the mind let him calculate the number of the wild beast, number for “of human” it is, and the number of it 666″ (Revelation 13:1, Greek Translation).

    The Greek word “anthrōpos” being used in verse 18 where it says “of human” is the Greek strongs concordance G444. The first two definitions of the word are “a human being, whether male or female”, and, “generically, to include all human individuals”. Could the number of the beast apply to all mankind?

    In the Greek (the New Testament was originally written in the Greek language), and other translations, you will notice the beast is described as an “it”, instead of “him”. The reason I’m making this point is because when a translation says “His number is 666”, this would imply a singular person, the Antichrist. But by saying “the number of it 666”, implies that it is of the beast system as a whole.

    We can know the number of the beast cannot be to identify products (like a new barcode) to buy or sell because scripture says we cannot buy or sell without the number of the beast. What am I getting at? There will be instances where you could buy something someone made themselves and it wouldn’t have a store branded identification on it. But for this number to be in our chips, that is where it must be to conclude ultimately that we cannot buy or sell without having the number of the beast. As previously mentioned in Revelation 13:18, the number of the beast (6+6+6=18) is a “human number”, definition “generically, to include all human individuals”.

    “Why did the Biden campaign choose 30330? 2020 divided by 666 = 3.0330 Who believes this to be a coincidence? October 2020 Isaiah 53:6 Someone said we are being whipsawed in 2020. Truly a great division is taking place between good and evil—both symbolically and literally (riots, unrest, politics). If you take the current year 2020 and divide it by the number 666 (known for its satanic implications) you will get the number 30330 (repeated). This number 30330 happens to be the number used to vote for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Freaky? Supernatural? Odd for sure. Whatever this means, it doesn’t seem good to me. First, why would anyone knowingly choose those particular numbers for their campaign? If they weren’t knowingly chosen, then it appears to be a supernatural act by the evil one himself and I would want to change those numbers ASAP. And if the numbers were chosen knowing their significance, are you satanic? Is this campaign satanic? Either way I do not believe this is a coincidence. And one thing is certain, 2020 is truly being divided by Satan. He is the master deceiver and spreader of chaos. Jesus calls him the father of lies.”

    So I looked up this number 30330 concerning Joe Biden, and I found this information:

    If you send a text to that number (at that time), you would get a response asking to support Joe’s campaign to take down Donald Trump, with one part in caps saying “CHIP IN >>” pointing to a link to go and donate.

    “CHIP IN”? Obama has used this phrase in the past on his twitter and people believe it is a subliminal message to receive the mark of the beast, that is to say the implantable RFID microCHIP that will go IN our body.

    Go to: http://bible-freedom.org to see all the proof!

    Is your name written in the Lamb’s book of life? Jesus says that we must be born again to enter the kingdom of God in the Gospel of John chapter 3.

    “Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name” (Revelation 14:9-11).

    BARACK OBAMA IS THE ANTICHRIST:

    In the Islamic religion they have man called the Mahdi who is known as their messiah of whom they are waiting to take the stage. There are many testimonies from people online who believe this man will be Barack Obama who is to be the biblical Antichrist based off dreams they have received. I myself have had strange dreams about him like no other person. So much so that I decided to share this information.

    He came on stage claiming to be a Christian with no affiliation to the Muslim faith…

    “In our lives, Michelle and I have been strengthened by our Christian faith. But there have been times where my faith has been questioned — by people who don’t know me — or they’ve said that I adhere to a different religion, as if that were somehow a bad thing,” – Barack Obama

    …but was later revealed by his own family members that he indeed is a devout Muslim.

    So what’s in the name? The meaning of someones name can say a lot about a person. God throughout history has given names to people that have a specific meaning tied to their lives. How about the name Barack Obama? Let us take a look at what may be hiding beneath the surface…

    “And He (Jesus) said to them (His disciples), ‘I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven'” (Luke 10:18).

    In the Hebrew language we can uncover the meaning behind the name Barack Obama.

    Barack, also transliterated as Baraq, in Hebrew is: lightning

    baraq – Biblical definition:

    From Strongs H1299; lightning; by analogy a gleam; concretely a flashing sword: – bright, glitter (-ing, sword), lightning. (Strongs Hebrew word H1300 baraq baw-rawk’)

    Barak ‘O’bamah, The use of bamah is used to refer to the “heights” of Heaven.

    bamah – Biblical definition:

    From an unused root (meaning to be high); an elevation: – height, high place, wave. (Strongs Hebrew word H1116 bamah baw-maw’)

    The day following the election of Barack Obama (11/04/08), the winning pick 3 lotto numbers in Illinois (Obama’s home state) for 11/5/08 were 666.

    Obama was a U.S. senator for Illinois, and his zip code was 60606.

    Jesus stands alone among the other religions who say to rightly weigh the scales of good and evil, and to make sure you have done more good than bad in this life. Is this how we conduct ourselves justly in a court of law? Bearing the image of God, is this how we project this image into our reality?

    Our good works cannot save us. If we step before a judge, being guilty of a crime, the judge will not judge us by the good that we have done, but rather the crimes we have committed. If we as fallen humanity, created in God’s image, pose this type of justice, how much more a perfect, righteous, and Holy God?

    God has brought down His moral law’s through the 10 commandments given to Moses at Mt. Sinai. These laws were not given so we may be justified, rather that we may see the need for a savior. They are the mirror of God’s character of what He has put in each and every one of us, with our conscious bearing witness that we know that it is wrong to steal, lie, dishonor our parents, and so forth.

    We can try and follow the moral laws of the 10 commandments, but we will never catch up to them to be justified before a Holy God. That same word of the law given to Moses became flesh over 2000 years ago in the body of Jesus Christ. He came to be our justification by fulfilling the law, living a sinless perfect life that only God could fulfill; even bringing the law to it’s truest light by stating, “You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:27-28).

    The gap between us and the law can never be reconciled by our own merit, but the arm of Jesus is stretched out by the grace and mercy of God. And if we are to grab on, through faith in Him, He will pull us up being the one to justify us. As in the court of law, if someone steps in and pays our fine, even though we are guilty, the judge can do what is legal and just and let us go free. That is what Jesus did almost 2000 years ago on the cross. It was a legal transaction being fulfilled in the spiritual realm by the shedding of His blood.

    Because God is Holy and just, the wrath that we deserve could not go unnoticed. Through the perfect righteousness and justice of God’s character, it must be dealt with, it must be quenched, it must be satisfied.

    For God takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezekiel 18:23). This is why in Isaiah chapter 53, where it speaks of the coming Messiah and His soul being a sacrifice for our sins, why it says it pleased God to crush His only begotten Son.

    This is because the wrath that we deserve was justified by being poured out upon His Son. If that wrath was poured out on us, we would all die and go to hell. God created a way of escape by pouring it out on His Son whose soul could not be left in Hades, but was raised to life on the third day and seated at the right hand of God in power.

    So now when we put on the Lord Jesus Christ (Romans 13:14), God no longer sees the person who deserves His wrath, but rather the glorious image of His perfect Son dwelling in us, justifying us as if we received the wrath we deserve, making a way of escape from the curse of death.

    Now what we must do is repent and put our trust and faith in the savior, confessing and forsaking our sins. This is not just a head knowledge of believing in Jesus, but rather receiving His words, taking them to heart, so that we may truly be transformed into the image of God. Where we no longer live to practice sin, but rather turn from our sins and practice righteousness through faith in Him.

    Jesus answered, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again'” (John 3:5-7).

    Come before the Lord with a contrite spirit, humble yourself, ask Him for His forgiveness, to receive the free gift of His salvation, to receive His Holy Spirit, so that you may be transformed into a new creature, into a child of the living God.

    There is a reason why the words of Jesus have been translated in to over 2000 languages, and nothing comes remotely close (the Quran just over 100), because there is a God in heaven who desires to have a relationship with you, to know Him through His word, as that is how we personally get to know anybody. There is a reason why it is the year 2021, because Jesus came to earth just over 2000 years ago fulfilling major prophecy causing a divide in our timeline.

    Jesus loves you! Seek Him while He may be found!

  4. Simply desire to say your article is as astonishing.
    The clearness for your submit is just excellent and that i can think you are a professional in this subject.

    Fine with your permission let me to grasp your RSS feed to stay updated with impending post.
    Thanks 1,000,000 and please keep up the gratifying work.

  5. Hello there! Quick question that’s entirely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile
    friendly? My blog looks weird when viewing from
    my apple iphone. I’m trying to find a template
    or plugin that might be able to fix this problem. If you have
    any recommendations, please share. Appreciate it!

  6. When someone writes an piece of writing he/she retains
    the idea of a user in his/her mind that how a user can know it.

    So that’s why this paragraph is great. Thanks!

  7. I’m extremely inspired together with your writing abilities and also with the format on your weblog.

    Is that this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself?
    Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare
    to see a great blog like this one today..

  8. I think that what you published made a great deal of sense.
    But, what about this? what if you were to write a awesome post title?
    I mean, I don’t want to tell you how too rrun your website,
    but suppose yoou added something that gravbed people’s attention? I mean Debunking the Myth of Assange as Terrorist – Anonymous Worldwide is a
    little plain. Yoou should look at Yahoo’s home page
    annd note how they creste article headlines to grab people to open the
    links. You might add a video or a pic or two to get people excited about everything’ve got
    to say. Just my opinion, it might make your blog a little
    livelier.
    Sildenafil 100 mg kaufen website levitra
    20 mg

  9. A fascinating discussion is definitely worth comment.
    I believe that you should write more on this subject, it may not
    be a taboo subject but typically folks don’t
    discuss such topics. To the next! Many thanks!!

  10. Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News?
    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there!

    Appreciate it

  11. Thanks for some other fantastic post. Where else
    may just anyone get that kind of info in such an ideal manner of writing?
    I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am at the look for such information.

  12. มิรู้สึกจักเริ่มแรก พนันเว็บไรน่าพอใจ
    คำนึงถึง Ufabet เท้าหน้าหลักสำคัญ คาสิโป่งออนไลน์ ถิ่นรองรับงานเล่นพนันขันต่อยังไม่ตายทั้งหมดแบบอย่าง พนันน้ำมือถือ Moblie
    iPhone ทุกวัย ได้มาทรัพย์สมบัติครัน 100%
    ในที่เด่น เว็บ Ufa อีฉันบริการด้วยความเต็มใจ ผละกลุ่มผลงานผู้ชำนาญ
    ณพร้อมแบ่งภาระ ขานรับกระทู้ถาม ซัพพอร์ทคุณทั้งนั้น 24 ครู่ ไหว้วานเพิกถอนสะดวก ขั้นต่ำเล็ก รองทั้งหมด โพยแบงก์แนวหน้า หา เว็บพนันเรียบร้อยยิ่ง จำต้อง
    ยูฟ่าเบท แต่
    สมัครยูฟ่าเบท เว็บตรงเช่นเดียวกันตัวเอง เปล่าผ่านเอเยนซ์
    เพราะครอบครอง เว็บพนันปราณีสยาม ลงมืออุปการะผู้แถวใจจดใจจ่อเป็นได้ ลงสมัคร
    ufabet หาได้กล้วยๆ เพียงแค่อุปการะหยิบมือสรุป ไออุ่นโฟน
    ซัมซุง ไม่ใช่หรือตราอื่นๆ หลังจากนั้นมาถึงเจียรแผ่นดิน อ่อนป
    Line หลังจากนั้นบริหารงาน Add เพื่อนพ้องเอี่ยม
    ufa360 ต่อจากนั้นเกริ่นงานบอก ก็จักประกอบด้วยภาระหน้าที่เฝ้าคอยปฏิบัติ ตอบคำถามข้อสงสัย
    ทั้งปวงกงการที่เธอทะเยอทะยานรู้ สมัครยูฟ่าเบท ยังไง สมัครลำบากหรือไม่ ใช้เวลากี่นาที
    จำเป็นจะต้องชดใช้อย่างไรในที่การลงสมัครบ้าง
    เสร็จ Standby อาจจะ สมัครผู้ร่วมทีมนวชาต จัดหามาทุกกลางวัน เปล่าประกอบด้วยวันหยุด
    โปรโมชั่น Ufabet ลูกทีมใหม่เงินโบนัสเพิ่มพูน
    ร้อย%
    พิเศษเกี่ยวกับผู้มัคกระทรวงแรงงานและสวัสดิการสังคมมาหาชิชะกซ้ำ โปรโมชั่นยูฟ่าเบท
    ขั้นแรกเข้า ฝากเบี้ย รับสารภาพเงินปันผล ให้เปล่าความไว้วางใจ เพิ่มประเดี๋ยวนี้ เปล่ากอบด้วยข้อตกลง คว้าทุกคน ทุก USER ร้องขอแค่ไม่ใช้คืนคณิตซ้อน ลูกทีมบุโรทั่ง ดีฉันแบ่งออกเงินส่งคืน
    ค้างสิโนสด เกมส์สล็อต กลับคืนที่สุดถึงแก่กรรม บริบูรณ์ 10% ทุกสัปดาห์ แดนประธาน มูลค่าคอมไม่ชชั่นกระบุงโกย แนะนำตัวเพื่อนพ้องลงมา โจ้ยูฟ่า
    ได้รับฟรีความน่าเชื่อถือ ผนวก 20% แม่แบบหมูๆ ไม่แตะปฏิบัติงานเทิร์นโอเวอร์ เข้าไปทะเบียนสัตว์ชักจูงโดยโด่ โปรแตงโมชั่นคุ้มๆ ดีๆ รุ่มยอด จำต้องแหล่ง ufabet-th360
    ทางเข้า Ufabet ซ้ำอัพเดตปัจจุบัน 2020
    Ufabet เป็น เว็บพนันเพราะว่าคนสยาม สำหรับสัตว์สองเท้าสยามเช่นเดียวกันกัน โดยเฉพาะ ก่อสละอีฉันถึงบางอ้อกรณีละโมบมูลฐานสิ่งของผู้สำแดงยังมีชีวิตอยู่ชนิดดีงาม แกจึงไม่จำเป็นจะต้องต้องหา ทางเข้า Ufa เรี่ยม ทั้งปวงทิวา อุปการะซับซ้อนเปลืองเวลา เสนาะไม่ว่าลื้อจะชำระคืนงาน Molibe ระเบียบปฎิบัติงาน iOS, Android ไม่ใช่หรือเข้าไปทำเพลงสร้างผ่านคอม โน้ตเพลงบุ๊ก เอ็งก็อาจจะเข้า เพราะพ้อง ได้มาตอนนี้ ไม่แตะต้องอกสั่นขวัญแขวน ลิงค์ไม่ดี แค่เพียงคลิกย่าน ปากทางยูฟ่าเบท

  13. I have been browsing online greater than three hours lately, yet I by no means discovered any interesting article like yours.
    It is lovely price enough for me. Personally, if all site owners and bloggers
    made good content as you probably did, the web will probably be much more useful
    than ever before.

  14. Yesterday, while I was at work, my sister stole my iphone and tested to see if it can survive a forty foot drop, just
    so she can be a youtube sensation. My apple ipad is now destroyed and she has 83 views.
    I know this is totally off topic but I had to share it with someone!

  15. Everything is very open with a very clear description of the challenges.
    It was definitely informative. Your site is very helpful.

    Many thanks for sharing!

  16. Hey there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me.
    Anyhow, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back often!

  17. I was suggested this blog by way of my cousin. I am not certain whether or not this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed approximately
    my trouble. You’re wonderful! Thanks!

  18. For hottest information you have to pay a visit the web and on internet I found this site as a finest web site for newest
    updates.

  19. I’m not sure why but this web site is loading extremely slow for me.
    Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my end?
    I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

  20. Howdy, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar
    one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam responses?
    If so how do you protect against it, any plugin or anything you can recommend?
    I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any help is very
    much appreciated.

    My blog post :: trancedance.com

  21. I’m not sure why but this blog is loading incredibly slow for me.
    Is anyone else having this problem or is it a problem on my end?
    I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

  22. What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I have
    discovered It absolutely helpful and it has helped me
    out loads. I’m hoping to contribute & assist different
    customers like its helped me. Great job.

  23. Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles?

    I mean, what you say is valuable and all. But think of if you added some
    great images or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”!
    Your content is excellent but with pics and video
    clips, this website could certainly be one of
    the greatest in its field. Very good blog!

  24. Hey there I am so delighted I found your website, I really found you by error, while I was researching on Google for something else,
    Anyways I am here now and would just like
    to say kudos for a marvelous post and a all round interesting blog (I
    also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to browse
    it all at the minute but I have saved it and also included your RSS
    feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read more, Please do keep up the fantastic work.

  25. I like the helpful info you supply for your articles. I will bookmark your
    blog and check once more here frequently. I am slightly
    certain I will be informed many new stuff right here!
    Good luck for the next!

  26. Good day! This is kind of off topic but I need some help from an established blog.
    Is it very difficult to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal
    but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about making my own but I’m
    not sure where to start. Do you have any tips or suggestions?

    Cheers

  27. I just could not go away your website prior to suggesting that I
    really loved the standard info an individual provide for your
    visitors? Is gonna be back often in order to investigate cross-check new posts

  28. Greetings! I’ve been reading your site for some time now and
    finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from
    Porter Tx! Just wanted to say keep up the excellent
    work!

  29. It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
    I’ve read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you few interesting things or suggestions.
    Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I wish to read more things about it!

  30. I relish, lead to I found exactly what I was looking for.

    You have ended my 4 day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man.
    Have a great day. Bye

  31. I am really inspired with your writing abilities and also
    with the format to your weblog. Is this a paid topic or did you modify it yourself?
    Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it is uncommon to see a nice
    weblog like this one these days..

  32. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I
    provide credit and sources back to your site? My
    website is in the very same area of interest as yours and
    my visitors would truly benefit from a lot of the information you provide here.
    Please let me know if this okay with you. Appreciate it!

  33. I was curious if you ever thought of changing the layout of your site?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 pictures.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

  34. It’s amazing to go to see this site and reading the views of all colleagues concerning this piece of writing, while I am also eager of getting familiarity.

  35. These are really wonderful ideas in regarding blogging.
    You have touched some good things here. Any way keep up
    wrinting.

    Review my web-site; A片

  36. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article.
    I will make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your
    useful info. Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly comeback.

  37. Spot on with this write-up, I really believe this website needs far more attention. I’ll probably be returning to see more,
    thanks for the information!

  38. I am extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your weblog.
    Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself?

    Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to see a great blog like this one today.

  39. What’s Going down i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found
    It positively useful and it has helped me out loads.
    I’m hoping to give a contribution & assist other users
    like its aided me. Great job.

  40. Does your website have a contact page? I’m having a tough time
    locating it but, I’d like to shoot you an email.
    I’ve got some creative ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing.
    Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it expand over time.

  41. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d certainly donate
    to this fantastic blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking
    and adding your RSS feed to my Google account.
    I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this blog
    with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

  42. I must thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this
    website. I’m hoping to check out the same high-grade blog posts by
    you in the future as well. In truth, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my very own blog now
    😉

  43. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I truly appreciate your efforts and I will be waiting for your next write ups thanks once again.

  44. Hi would you mind stating which blog platform you’re using?
    I’m looking to start my own blog soon but I’m having a hard time selecting between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and
    Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs
    and I’m looking for something unique.
    P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  45. I do not know if it’s just me or if perhaps everyone else experiencing problems with your site.
    It appears like some of the text on your content are running off the screen.
    Can somebody else please provide feedback and
    let me know if this is happening to them too? This could be a issue with my web browser
    because I’ve had this happen before. Kudos

  46. Hi there, I discovered your site by the use of Google even as looking for a
    similar subject, your website came up, it looks great.
    I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, just was alert to your weblog via Google, and located that it’s truly informative.
    I’m gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate in case you
    continue this in future. Numerous folks can be benefited from your
    writing. Cheers!

  47. You really make it appear really easy along with your presentation but I in finding this matter to
    be actually one thing which I believe I might never understand.
    It kind of feels too complicated and extremely vast for me.

    I’m having a look forward for your next post, I’ll attempt to get
    the hang of it!

  48. Currently it seems like BlogEngine is the best blogging
    platform out there right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you’re using on your blog?

  49. Hi there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with
    hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended
    up losing months of hard work due to no backup.

    Do you have any methods to stop hackers?

  50. First of all I want to say awesome blog! I had a quick question which I’d like to
    ask if you don’t mind. I was curious to know how you center yourself and clear
    your mind before writing. I’ve had a hard time clearing my thoughts
    in getting my thoughts out there. I truly do take
    pleasure in writing however it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes tend to be wasted simply just trying
    to figure out how to begin. Any ideas or hints? Thank you!

  51. I’m impressed, I have to admit. Seldom do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and amusing, and without a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head.

    The issue is something not enough people are speaking intelligently about.

    Now i’m very happy that I stumbled across this in my hunt for something concerning
    this.

  52. Hey there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re working with?
    I’m going to start my own blog soon but I’m having a hard
    time selecting between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design seems different
    then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique.
    P.S My apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask!

  53. My brother recommended I might like this website. He was once
    totally right. This submit truly made my day.

    You can not imagine simply how so much time I had spent for this info!
    Thanks!

  54. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled
    blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your magnificent
    post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks!

  55. Hi there, I discovered your blog via Google while looking
    for a similar matter, your web site came up, it looks great.

    I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, just became aware of your blog via Google, and located that
    it’s truly informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels.
    I’ll appreciate if you continue this in future. Lots of
    people shall be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  56. Good day very cool blog!! Guy .. Excellent .. Amazing ..
    I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds also?
    I am satisfied to find a lot of helpful information right here within the submit, we want work
    out more strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing.
    . . . . .

  57. Its like you read my mind! You seem to know a lot about this, like you wrote
    the book in it or something. I think that you can do with some pics to drive the
    message home a bit, but other than that, this is fantastic blog.
    A fantastic read. I will certainly be back.

    Stop by my web blog: 美女

  58. My coder is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP.
    I have always disliked the idea because of the costs.

    But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on several websites for
    about a year and am anxious about switching to another
    platform. I have heard very good things about blogengine.net.
    Is there a way I can import all my wordpress content into it?
    Any help would be really appreciated!

  59. After I initially left a comment I appear to have clicked
    the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on every time a comment is added I
    receive 4 emails with the exact same comment. Perhaps there
    is an easy method you are able to remove me from that service?
    Thanks!

  60. Today, I went to the beach front with my kids. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her ear and screamed.
    There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is totally off topic but I had to tell someone!

  61. Definitely believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the net
    the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about worries that they plainly do not know about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having
    side-effects , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to
    get more. Thanks

    Visit my blog post A片

  62. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was curious what all is
    needed to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very web savvy so I’m not 100% sure. Any tips or advice would be
    greatly appreciated. Appreciate it

  63. Hi there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers?

    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing months
    of hard work due to no data backup. Do you have any methods to protect against hackers?

  64. Hi there very cool web site!! Man .. Beautiful ..
    Superb .. I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds also?
    I’m glad to find a lot of useful information right here within the submit,
    we’d like develop extra strategies in this regard, thanks for
    sharing. . . . . .

  65. I visited several websites however the audio quality for audio songs present
    at this web site is actually marvelous.

  66. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it
    up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back later on. Cheers

  67. It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it is
    time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I want to suggest you
    few interesting things or advice. Perhaps you could write
    next articles referring to this article. I
    wish to read even more things about it!

  68. I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you make this website yourself or
    did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz reply as I’m looking to create my own blog and would like to find out where u got this from.

    thank you

  69. Simply desire to say your article is as astonishing.
    The clearness in your post is just cool and i could assume you are an expert on this subject.
    Well with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date
    with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the rewarding work.

  70. Right here is the right site for anybody who really wants to find out about this topic.
    You understand a whole lot its almost hard to argue
    with you (not that I really will need to…HaHa).
    You definitely put a brand new spin on a topic which
    has been discussed for ages. Great stuff, just great!

  71. Hi there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I
    came to check it out. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers!
    Outstanding blog and fantastic style and design.

  72. I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you make this
    website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you?
    Plz answer back as I’m looking to design my own blog and would like to find out where u
    got this from. appreciate it

  73. Hi there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after looking at many of the articles I realized it’s
    new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely delighted I stumbled upon it and I’ll be book-marking
    it and checking back often!

  74. Usually I do not learn post on blogs, however I wish to
    say that this write-up very compelled me to try and do it! Your writing taste has been amazed me.
    Thanks, very nice article.

  75. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was
    great. I do not know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

  76. Your style is very unique in comparison to other people I’ve read stuff from.
    I appreciate you for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark
    this page.

    my homepage: 亞洲A片

  77. Hi, i think that i saw you visited my weblog so i came to “return the favor”.I’m trying
    to find things to enhance my web site!I suppose its ok to use
    some of your ideas!!

Leave a Reply to Eric Harvey Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *